Amelia Rajecki vs Kajsa Rinaldo Persson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve analysis shows Persson leads slightly, winning 45.56% of points, compared to Rajecki’s 42.68% over the past six months. Does a strong second serve often predict the likely match winner? Yes, it usually does.
• Looking at return games, Persson has a slight edge on second serve returns, with a win rate of 50.96% versus Rajecki’s 49.2%. On first serve returns, Persson outpaces Rajecki significantly, at 36.66% to 26.75%.
• Under pressure, Rajecki performs better, saving 51.47% of breakpoints compared to Persson’s 47.2%, indicating a potential advantage in critical moments.
• In terms of match success over the past year, Persson holds a slight edge with a 60.42% winning rate compared to Rajecki's 57.81%.
• Both players prefer hard surfaces, with Rajecki achieving a 58% win rate on Hard and Persson at 58% as well, but Persson excels on Indoor Hard at 62%.
• Examining match levels, Persson has a higher win percentage in <$10K tournaments (60.87% vs. Rajecki's 56.25%), suggesting better form against similar competition.
• In their sole head-to-head match, Persson defeated Rajecki, winning two sets to one, emphasizing an advantage in direct encounters.
• Both players perform similarly in deciding sets against all opponents, each winning 43% of these matches, making their performance in final sets evenly matched.
• Their past encounter on Indoor Hard, where Persson prevailed, gives Persson a surface-specific advantage.
• Break point conversion rates are close, with Rajecki converting 38.39% and Persson 38.2%, making it a negligible factor in their performance disparity.

Editorial Prediction (June 8, 2025, UTC):

Considering second serve performance, Persson holds a marginal advantage, indicating potentially superior consistency in serve games. Return game statistics also highlight Persson’s supremacy, especially in first serve return points, which are pivotal in breaking serve.

When analyzed under pressure, Rajecki slightly outperforms Persson in warding off breakpoints, hinting at resilience during crucial moments. However, Persson’s better overall match win rate indicates a potential edge in longer sequences of play.

The players have matched against relatively similar opponent ranks, but Persson’s current form and previous head-to-head victory offer tangible advantages. Their track record on Indoor Hard reinforces Persson's likelihood to dominate on this surface.

While both competitors convert breakpoints with similar efficiency, Persson’s overall strengths in second serve returns and past head-to-head performance suggest that Persson is the more likely candidate to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.